Righteous Money?

For Christians, money is not a neutral tool. Scripture treats how we handle wealth as a direct reflection of where we place our trust. The monetary system we inhabit shapes that trust in ways most believers have never considered.

PointWhat it means
Money as discipleshipJesus spoke about money more than almost any other topic. How we earn, save and give reflects what we actually value rather than what we profess to value.
The Mammon warningJesus named wealth as a rival to God. “You cannot serve both God and Mammon.” Wealth has a spiritual dimension that cannot be separated from how the monetary system operates.
Honest weightsProverbs 11:1 calls a false balance an abomination to the Lord. The biblical pattern is consistent: honest money is a matter of justice and character.
Fiat’s structural dishonestyFiat currency erodes purchasing power through inflation, rewards debtors over savers, and obscures how the system works from ordinary people.
Bitcoin’s fixed supplyTwenty-one million coins, enforced by mathematics and distributed consensus. No government, bank or institution can alter that number.

Money as a discipleship issue

Jesus addressed money more often than heaven or hell. He was not preoccupied with wealth as an economic question. He was concerned with it as a spiritual one. Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. That is not a metaphor about financial planning. It is an observation about the nature of human loyalty.

The Mammon warning is even starker. Jesus did not say wealth was difficult to handle or that it posed certain risks. He named it as a rival to God. Mammon is not a neutral term. In the tradition Jesus was drawing from, it represented wealth as a kind of spiritual force that could command a person’s allegiance in direct competition with God.

This framing matters for anyone thinking about Bitcoin from a Christian perspective. The question is not simply whether Bitcoin is a good investment. The question is whether the monetary system we participate in is honest. Whether it rewards thrift or penalises it. Whether it serves ordinary people or extracts from them quietly.

Honest weights and the biblical pattern

Proverbs 11:1 is direct: “A false balance is an abomination to the LORD, but a just weight is his delight.” The verse sits in a long biblical tradition of concern about honest measurement. Leviticus 19, Deuteronomy 25, Amos 8, Micah 6. The consistent pattern is that God cares about the integrity of economic exchange.

This was not abstract religious concern. In ancient economies, a merchant with two sets of weights could systematically defraud buyers and sellers for an entire career. The victim of a false balance might never know the fraud had occurred. God’s concern for honest weights was a concern for justice toward ordinary people who had no way to verify the scales.

The application to monetary inflation is direct. When a central bank expands the money supply without corresponding growth in real production, it dilutes the purchasing power of every rand held by ordinary citizens. The person holding savings bears the cost. The government or institution that issues the new money receives the benefit. This is the modern equivalent of the false balance: a transfer of value that most people do not see happening.

Jimmy Song’s argument on fiat and Christian values

Jimmy Song’s essay on Christians and Bitcoin makes a pointed argument. Fiat money does not merely cause economic inefficiencies. It actively shapes behaviour in ways that conflict with Christian virtues. It rewards debt over thrift. It punishes patience. It raises time preference, meaning it makes people less willing to defer gratification and more oriented toward immediate consumption.

Song argues that a monetary system designed around debasement systematically undermines the character formation that Christianity calls people toward. A person who saves diligently in fiat currency is penalised year after year by inflation. A person who borrows heavily and purchases assets is rewarded by asset price inflation. The incentive structure runs in the wrong direction.

This is not a call to get rich quickly. Song’s point is about integrity at the systemic level. Bitcoin’s fixed supply means no one can manufacture more of it to serve political ends. The ledger is public. The rules are enforced by mathematics. A monetary system with those properties is, on Song’s reading, far more consistent with the biblical vision of honest weights than one managed by institutions with the power to alter the supply.

Stan Reeve and the Church’s opportunity

Stan Reeve’s essay published by Founders Ministries approaches the question from a different angle. He is not primarily concerned with whether Bitcoin is sound economics. He is asking what shrewdness looks like for Christians managing resources in a fallen world.

The reference is Luke 16. Jesus commended the dishonest manager for his shrewdness in using worldly wealth to prepare for the future. The point was not the dishonesty but the prudence. Christians, Jesus said, should be at least as shrewd with eternal resources as worldly people are with worldly ones.

Reeve’s argument is that Bitcoin gives churches and Christian individuals a way to preserve resources outside a monetary system that systematically works against long-term stewardship. Mission organisations that hold reserves in currency subject to inflation see their giving power erode over time. A church that understands Bitcoin’s properties can think more carefully about how to preserve resources for future use.

Gold, honesty and Bitcoin’s advance

Gold served as honest money for much of Christian history. Its supply grows slowly because mining is expensive and finite. No king or government could print gold into existence. The discipline imposed by a gold standard was precisely that governments had to live within their means or openly devalue.

Gold’s practical limitations are real. It is heavy. Transferring it across borders is slow and expensive. Verifying its authenticity requires physical assay. These limitations meant gold’s role as everyday money gave way over centuries to paper claims on gold and eventually to paper with no gold backing at all.

Bitcoin addresses those limitations directly. Its supply cap of twenty-one million is not managed by any institution. It is enforced by distributed consensus among thousands of nodes running the same rules worldwide. The cap cannot be changed without the agreement of a majority of the network. In practice that makes the supply rule more resistant to political pressure than any gold standard in history has ever been.

Stewardship rather than speculation

This article is not an argument for speculation. The question of whether Bitcoin’s price will rise next month is not a theological one. The question of whether Christians should understand the monetary system they inhabit and consider alternatives that better align with biblical principles of honest exchange is a different question entirely.

Stewardship in Scripture is always about faithfulness with what has been entrusted. The parable of the talents penalises the servant who buried his talent and returned it unchanged. The principle is not that Christians should take reckless risks. It is that passivity in the face of avoidable loss is not stewardship.

A Christian who understands that holding savings in a currency with a structural inflation rate is watching purchasing power erode year after year, and who does nothing about it on the grounds that these are worldly matters, may be making a theological error as much as a financial one.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bitcoin compatible with Christian values?

Bitcoin’s fixed supply and transparent rules align with the biblical principle of honest weights and measures. Whether holding Bitcoin reflects sound stewardship or undue speculation depends on the individual’s circumstances and motivations. The monetary properties themselves are more consistent with biblical economic ethics than a system that allows unlimited money creation by institutions with political interests.

What does Proverbs 11:1 have to do with money today?

The verse addresses the integrity of economic measurement. A false balance allowed ancient merchants to systematically defraud people without detection. Monetary inflation operates similarly: purchasing power is transferred from ordinary savers to institutions that issue new money, without most people understanding what is happening. The principle of honest weights applies to any system that obscures these transfers.

Should churches consider holding Bitcoin?

Stan Reeve’s argument at Founders Ministries is that churches should at least consider the question seriously. A church holding reserves in a currency that inflates at several percent per year is watching its future giving capacity erode. Bitcoin’s fixed supply offers an alternative that may preserve resources more faithfully over long time horizons. Individual circumstances and governance structures will determine whether it is appropriate.

What is the Mammon warning about?

Jesus identified Mammon as a spiritual rival to God rather than simply a practical danger. The warning is that wealth can command a person’s loyalty in ways that displace God. This makes the integrity of the monetary system a spiritual concern rather than merely an economic one. How a monetary system shapes human behaviour, whether it rewards patience or punishes it, whether it is transparent or obscure, is not ethically neutral from a Christian perspective.

Is this article saying Christians should buy Bitcoin?

No. This article argues that Christians should not ignore the monetary system and the ethical questions it raises. Whether to hold Bitcoin is a personal decision that depends on individual circumstances, financial situation, and stewardship responsibilities. The argument here is about awareness and integrity rather than a specific financial prescription.

Sources

  • Jimmy Song: On Christians Investing in Bitcoin: essay on fiat money, time preference and Christian virtue
  • Stan Reeve, Founders Ministries: Shrewd Money for the Sons of Light: theological case for the Church considering Bitcoin in stewardship and mission
  • Proverbs 11:1 (ESV): biblical text on honest weights and measures
  • South African Reserve Bank: Monetary Policy: South Africa’s inflation targeting framework and historical inflation data

Ready to get your Bitcoin position right?

SimplB helps South African investors buy and hold Bitcoin properly. A short call is a good place to start.

Talk to a Bitcoin Specialist

Written by James Caw, Founder of SimplB. James has helped South Africans understand, buy and secure Bitcoin since 2015. SimplB operates as a Juristic Representative of CAEP Asset Managers, FSP 33933. Last updated: May 2026.

This article is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax or exchange control advice. The information reflects the regulatory position as at the date of publication. Your individual circumstances may differ and you should seek qualified professional advice before making any decisions.

author avatar
James Caw